🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that began as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has taken on a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate gatherings where African descendants are compensated to speak with white audiences about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Éire and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the celebration is celebrated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how important it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels empowered to state that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in Europe as a entirety.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A campaign to scrub Black history and legacy from the archives is under way. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be effective if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the conditions of the contemporary world. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is needed. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just do away with events including Black History Month altogether, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an period that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an foundation that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Organizations who observe it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to minor insults, but challenged by the risks that impact society if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.